|
Speeches and presentations
Statement by Business
and Industry
Jack
Whelan, ICC, Statement to the 10th Session UN Commission on Sustainable Development,
30 April 2001
As the 10th session of CSD
commences its work, I wish to signal the continuing commitment by business to
participate fully in the Johannesburg Summit and the preparatory process.
Business is well aware of
the need to not simply review the nature and extent of progress achieved since
1992, but also to look forward, building on the acceptance that the global environmental
challenge has broadened to include the overall goal of sustainability, in which
the demands for social and economic benefits are also met, with a particular
emphasis on the needs of developing countries.
I do not need to repeat
here the central part played by business in achieving sustainable development.
The business sector is clearly the 'engine room' for the three 'I's : the Innovation
and Investment required, and the Implementation of policies which balance the
social, economic and environmental imperatives which lie at the heart of sustainable
development.
Over the next century, with
its managerial, financial and technical expertise, business and industry will
continue to be the main producer and provider of goods and services to society,
employment, prosperity and the source of new technologies and other solutions
that will enable us to achieve our shared objective.
There is, however, a fourth
'I' - Integration - increasingly, we see evidence for the vital role of the
Multi-Stakeholder Processes - not simply Dialogues - but the process of identifying
and forging relationships and partnerships with governments and other stakeholders,
because the issues faced are profound multi-sectoral and multi-dimensional challenges.
Stakeholders do not act in isolation, nor do governments.
In the business community,
we are improving our performance in this respect - through greater awareness
of our responsibilities not only to the environment and the economy, but also
to consumers, shareholders, employees, communities, and in the fields of research
and foreign direct investment.
The inclusion of multi-stakeholder
processes as a key element in the preparatory process leading to the Summit
is particularly welcome and we intend to play a full and active part with the
other major groups. Governments which have not already done so, should also
be encouraged to invite the participation of stakeholders at all levels in their
national and regional preparations.
The Secretary General's
report refers to regional roundtables of eminent persons, and business leaders
are willing to take part.
Mr Chairman, having participated
in an effective Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue on sustainable energy and transport
during CSD9 two weeks ago, a forum pioneered by CSD in previous years, we are
encouraged to note that the final decisions on transport and energy recognized
"multi-stakeholder participation and coordination within and between governments
as relevant for policy formulation".
This demonstrates that the
contribution of the stakeholder consultation process is maturing to become an
integral part of the search for rational, considered and consensus-based solutions.
Indeed, the model is being adapted at a growing number of similar fora elsewhere,
such as at the FAO Committee on Agriculture in Rome last month.
To highlight the fourth
'I'- Integration - business intends to be fully equipped to contribute to the
Summit process by showcasing a myriad of examples of projects, initiatives and
practices which present governments with tested solutions as role models which
are ready to be amplified into policies to achieve sustainable development.
The International Chamber
of Commerce and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development have
developed a Summit theme for all business sectors to adopt under the banner
'Business Action for Sustainable Development'. Sir Mark Moody-Stuart launched
the initiative here at the United Nations two weeks ago. He said that the aim
is to create a network among business groups at international, regional and
sectoral levels, and to ensure that the world business community is assigned
its proper place at the Summit and its preparations, and that we are seen to
be playing a progressive and constructive role, with a business-like emphasis
on action and an openness to partnership.
In Southern Africa, our
colleagues have already mobilised business organisations into a 'Business Coordinating
Forum', which is soliciting input from a variety of sectors, and is leading
the participation of business in the multi-stakeholder advisory committee for
the Summit.
We recognize the CSD9 Chairman's
suggestion of a "New Deal" as a visionary and inclusive approach to
the challenges which we all face.
The Summit must address
profound global issues such as poverty eradication, food security, access to
clean water, HIV/AIDS, atmospheric quality, debt relief, access to all forms
of finance, including foreign direct investment, the transfer of appropriate
technologies, and address the cross-cutting themes in which we all have a common
interest. These challenges will require the commitment of the global community,
and the participation of all sectors of civil society. The question is, how
can we design a structure for the Summit that will accommodate all those who
have a role and ought to be consulted, and goes beyond the limitations of the
planned half-day multi-stakeholder dialogue?
There is no simple answer,
but we would consider the geographical segregation of major stakeholder groups
into separate venues, somewhat distant from the core intergovernmental Summit,
as a regressive step. It may prove difficult to enlist support from our constituents
on the basis of such a model. A more modern option, which would encourage an
inclusive and cooperative approach, would be to 'cluster' the issues to be addressed
in the different venues, allowing the various stakeholder groups to contribute
productively to the governments' deliberations.
Such a 'clustered' design
would focus the agenda on the issues and not the process, increase the capacity
for action-oriented decisions, enhance participation, and would ensure that
the Summit lives up to our expectations.
|